Comments on: Will Corn Ethanol Flunk EPA Emissions Requirements? http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/ Making Sense out of the Green Environment Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:20:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Jefffrey S. Marth http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-14084 Jefffrey S. Marth Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:00:11 +0000 http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-14084 Where and hell does this guy live? In a cave? An oil well? As for the letter he references, the group called Friends of the Environmnet, are NO FRIENDS OF MINE, or our Planet. Calling yourself a friend does not make you a friend - your actions make you a friend. Spreading false info makes you a lyer, not a friend of Earth. The claims made in this article are completely bogus and have been debunked by great minds! The author is obviousely promoting junk science for the auto and oil industry. FACTS: BIOHOLS are here to stay. Ethanol is just one of the fuels. Corn is important today to jump start and seed the infrastructure for E85 from lignocellulosic ethanal. We are 1-3 years away from full scale production at $2/gal! NO ONE IS SAYING CORN IS THE FUTURE FOR ETHANOL! I DON'T HEAR THIS GROUP DISPUTING GASOLINE! Fact: Gasoline is way out of the Energy Balance equation - not ethanol/biohols. Fact: Gasoline is killing people and our planet with hazardous emissions. THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY IS UNITED and is PROVING CELLULOSIC ETHANOL IS THE PATHWAY TO THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUELS. And will not require subsidies, unlike gasoline. Take a look: SEE http://www.khoslaventures.com/resources.html SEE (E3, RangeFuels, LS9, Kior,...) Looks like the author fails the Darwinian Test... Ha. Call me anytime for more BioFuel facts and info: 650-213-9979 Visit http://www.UnitedBioLube.us for even more Green Chemistry info. Where and hell does this guy live? In a cave? An oil well?

As for the letter he references, the group called Friends of the Environmnet, are NO FRIENDS OF MINE, or our Planet. Calling yourself a friend does not make you a friend - your actions make you a friend. Spreading false info makes you a lyer, not a friend of Earth.

The claims made in this article are completely bogus and have been debunked by great minds! The author is obviousely promoting junk science for the auto and oil industry.

FACTS: BIOHOLS are here to stay. Ethanol is just one of the fuels. Corn is important today to jump start and seed the infrastructure for E85 from lignocellulosic ethanal. We are 1-3 years away from full scale production at $2/gal!

NO ONE IS SAYING CORN IS THE FUTURE FOR ETHANOL! I DON’T HEAR THIS GROUP DISPUTING GASOLINE!

Fact: Gasoline is way out of the Energy Balance equation - not ethanol/biohols. Fact: Gasoline is killing people and our planet with hazardous emissions.

THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY IS UNITED and is PROVING CELLULOSIC ETHANOL IS THE PATHWAY TO THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUELS. And will not require subsidies, unlike gasoline.

Take a look:

SEE http://www.khoslaventures.com/resources.html
SEE (E3, RangeFuels, LS9, Kior,…)

Looks like the author fails the Darwinian Test… Ha.

Call me anytime for more BioFuel facts and info: 650-213-9979

Visit http://www.UnitedBioLube.us for even more Green Chemistry info.

]]> By: chemicallygreen.com http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-11274 chemicallygreen.com Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:23:32 +0000 http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-11274 @Mike: Thanks for the comments. This was a commentary piece and the author has expressed his views and you expressed yours. @Mike: Thanks for the comments. This was a commentary piece and the author has expressed his views and you expressed yours.

]]> By: Mike http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-11200 Mike Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:42:49 +0000 http://chemicallygreen.com/ethanol-epa-standards/#comment-11200 The article you are referring to in the DM Register was written by an environmental lobbyist and is a "commentary". It is not a "news" piece. Looking at land use and corn-based ethanol is important. However, concluding that an acre of corn in Iowa that goes to ethanol results in an acre of forest being plowed is not good science; yet that is what the author of that piece suggests by citing a research article that has been debunked more than once. The article you are referring to in the DM Register was written by an environmental lobbyist and is a “commentary”. It is not a “news” piece.

Looking at land use and corn-based ethanol is important. However, concluding that an acre of corn in Iowa that goes to ethanol results in an acre of forest being plowed is not good science; yet that is what the author of that piece suggests by citing a research article that has been debunked more than once.

]]>